Random Thoughts From A Mad Man

Google Ad
The Out Campaign: Scarlet Letter of Atheism

JCHutchins Author of 7th Son: Descent

JCHutchins Author of 7th Son: Descent

JCHutchins Author of 7th Son: Descent









TwitterCounter for @drduran

Twitter Update

ip-location
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos and videos from drduran. Make your own badge here.

(Source: amelmm)

Comments (View)

z1c:

being 20+ on tumblr

image

Heck, I’m 40+!

(Source: wif2, via shesadaytrippa)

Comments (View)

blastoisex:

what a strange dog 

(Source: sizvideos, via bloozies)

Comments (View)
asktoseemygavin:

littleoctopiloveyou:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
Hrm.
HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

It’s back

I am not sure whether to laugh, cry, or start a petition for square donut.


Square donuts?

asktoseemygavin:

littleoctopiloveyou:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

It’s back

I am not sure whether to laugh, cry, or start a petition for square donut.

Square donuts?

(Source: nimstrz, via deansstonedangel)

Comments (View)

batman-who:

The Princess Bride by Kevin Bolk

(via thiswholewideworld)

Comments (View)
Comments (View)
imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

blue screen of death

System has encountered an error and needs to shut down… your life.

He’ll monitor your journey to the afterlife.

404 error: mercy not found

Death really knows how to crash a party.

control-alt-death

you better reblog this because those jokes lost me 3 followers.

imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

imaginefallout:

blue screen of death

System has encountered an error and needs to shut down… your life.

He’ll monitor your journey to the afterlife.

404 error: mercy not found

Death really knows how to crash a party.

control-alt-death

you better reblog this because those jokes lost me 3 followers.

(via pillarofiron)

Comments (View)
Comments (View)

(Source: skullboy2772, via pillarofiron)

Comments (View)

bubblegumdefective:

martininamerica:

Oh shit

Oh wow, that’s a powerful gifset right there…

generally fucking abhor anything to do with the prequels, but this is neat

(Source: tedywestside)

Comments (View)

maesterfili:

Not as clumsy or random as a blaster. More skill than simple sight was required for its use. An elegant weapon. It was a symbol as well. Anyone can use a blaster or a fusioncutter - but to use a lightsaber well was the mark of someone a cut above the ordinary.

(via peterpayne)

Comments (View)

secretlifeofageekygirl:

halinacrown:

official-canadianjesus:

roman-sunshine:

Beetles compromise 25% of all animal species. That means 1 in 4 animals is probably a beetle. Is it you? Is it your best friend? How can you be sure?

Ringo could be living in your backyard without you even knowing

image

THIS IS IT. THIS IS MY FAVORITE POST ON TUMBLR

(via deansstonedangel)

Comments (View)

365daysofsexy:

OSRIC CHAU looking good in the Akira Project trailer.

(Source: youtube.com, via deansstonedangel)

Comments (View)

bisexiel:

ravenclawsleftclaw:

bisexiel:

BISEXUALS ARE NOT CONFUSED

Bisexuals are not confused

BISEXUALS. ARE. NOT. CONFUSED.

BISEXUALS ARE NOT CONFUSED

bisexuals are not confused god this is like the easiest concept ever you piece of shit douchewagon why can’t you just fucking accept it it’s absolutely infuriating

idk im kind of confused on taxes?? 

BISEXUALS ARE ONLY SLIGHTLY CONFUSED ABOUT A FEW THINGS

LIKE TAXES AND AP CALC AND THE OCCASIONAL RIDDLE

Damn taxes!

(Source: starspangledpunk, via deansstonedangel)

Comments (View)
Comments (View)